Uploaded image for project: 'Calcite'
  1. Calcite
  2. CALCITE-2675

Type validation error as ReduceExpressionRule fails to preserve type nullability

VotersWatch issueWatchersLinkCloneUpdate Comment AuthorReplace String in CommentUpdate Comment VisibilityDelete Comments
    XMLWordPrintableJSON

Details

    • Bug
    • Status: Closed
    • Major
    • Resolution: Fixed
    • None
    • 1.18.0
    • None
    • None

    Description

      If a simplification could happen after some ReduceExpression rewrite; the simplification result may have a slightly different type in nullability.

        @Test public <T> void testReduceCaseNullabilityChange() throws Exception {
          HepProgram program = new HepProgramBuilder()
              .addRuleInstance(ReduceExpressionsRule.FILTER_INSTANCE)
              .addRuleInstance(ReduceExpressionsRule.PROJECT_INSTANCE)
              .build();
      
          try (Hook.Closeable a = Hook.REL_BUILDER_SIMPLIFY.add(Hook.propertyJ(false))) {
            checkPlanning(program,
                "select case when empno = 1 then 1 when 1 IS NOT NULL then 2 else null end as qx "
                    + "from emp");
          }
      

      Exposed by CALCITE-1413 changes; I'm not sure if there is any other variations for which the same could happen.

      Attachments

        Issue Links

        Activity

          This comment will be Viewable by All Users Viewable by All Users
          Cancel

          People

            kgyrtkirk Zoltan Haindrich
            kgyrtkirk Zoltan Haindrich
            Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            3 Start watching this issue

            Dates

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved:

              Slack

                Issue deployment